- Joined
- Feb 3, 2023
- Messages
- 4,929
- Reaction score
- 6,384
- Points
- 168
Classic Youboob. Two Bubbas trying to prove their favorite rifle is better. The sensible comments pretty much call them out. Plus the usual fanbois and haters in both camps weighing in. Weak spring, promag calls the test into question. I could be wrong but I'd put money on neither one of them ever was in a war zone.
The AR did well though. As it should. The difference is when you are roaming out in the woods, you dont have a nice bench with all your cleaning materials there to fix the AR. In this situation, with an AK, you run some water thru it and it's good to go.
The average Jihadi would respectfully disagree with this test. There's a reason why Israel based their Galil on the AK. I think it's a better AK than the real Russki.
I do agree the AR is overall a better rifle than the AK. Take two guys. Put them out in the woods or wetlands or desert for a month with no shelter and no cleaning kits, no tools. I know which gun will still be working.
The AR did well though. As it should. The difference is when you are roaming out in the woods, you dont have a nice bench with all your cleaning materials there to fix the AR. In this situation, with an AK, you run some water thru it and it's good to go.
The average Jihadi would respectfully disagree with this test. There's a reason why Israel based their Galil on the AK. I think it's a better AK than the real Russki.
I do agree the AR is overall a better rifle than the AK. Take two guys. Put them out in the woods or wetlands or desert for a month with no shelter and no cleaning kits, no tools. I know which gun will still be working.
Last edited: