Looks like a new fcu 80

[FrankenGlock]

That's the main premise of the RXM. Drop the FCU into any RXM compatible frames, just like the Sig fcu. As of the last time I looked, Ruger and Magpul only had 1 frame available. G19 size. I suppose if the sales take off like they both hope, additional models will come out, most likely a G19X or G45.

Since it accepts gen3 internals and Glock slides, a 23 or 35 are also possibilities for the public to change over to.

The frame accepts a few of the Gen 3 internals. Only the trigger bar, connector, and trigger spring. The trigger housing is their design so it will work with an FCU and so you don’t have to use a trigger housing pin but without the FCU it is needed to keep it intact. I have some that I made to work with Glock internals and one is running a GPT trigger. Can’t do that with theirs. Another is running a Timney that I managed to retrofit to their housing. The easiest way is to modify their housing and use P80 compatible one piece rear rails and modify it to fit their frame.

I was going to post a video with detailed directions on how to convert the RXM but I did not want to attract attention from some overly zealous blue state prosecutor and come after me. I also did not want to ruin it for the Ruger fans that actually like the platform and use the FCU. It is not illegal to make your own firearm and I’ve made 4 of the FrankenRugers and they work perfectly. They all seem to prefer the Magpul mags and run flawlessly with them but are finicky with some others.

Ruger is coming out with a subcompact and full size version soon. It’s already on the Magpul website but not yet available for purchase.

Here is the biggest hint I will give you and the most important piece. You can use the P80 940V2 jig for the trigger housing holes but that’s it. Use their locking block for the trigger pin hole alignment. Do not use the P80 jig for this as it won’t have the proper alignment. It will look correct but it is not and will create extra work for you.

 

[James Moore]

All I know about Defense Distributed is that if you look at the Plaintiffs in just about every major lawsuit fighting for our rights to continue making 80% firearms, they were in the fight. I've heard a bunch of the rumors by so called developers, but I haven't seen any of them giving up any profits to fight for our 2A rights.

 

[Bobster]

As of the last time I looked, Ruger and Magpul only had 1 frame available.

A month or two ago I sent MagPul an email asking when the larger grip was coming out (19x or 17) and the answer sent back was thus:
"Thank you for reaching out to Magpul. We don’t currently have that item. While we certainly love talking about our products, we cannot comment on anything that may or may not be in development."

 

[James Moore]

Well I don’t know too much about him but I do know friends don’t let friends use defcad because it was rumored to be fed bait.

I use Defcad and I don't worry about the Feds. I do know they get a lot of bad press, because they require you to provide a valid address within the USA and not be a resident of New Jersey to download their files. This is a Court ordered requirement and it pisses off a bunch of crybabies who think that Defcad should tell the Courts and the ATF to fuck off.

 

[Bongo Lewi]

Among those who talk the most about Feds surveilling gun forums, I've observed that most of the time their true adversary is their own mouth.