Breaking! Police officer, civilian shot inside midtown Manhattan office building: Sources

Breaking news!

NavyVette

Patriot Serving Patriots!
Exchange Privileges
Joined
Jul 30, 2022
Messages
1,931
Reaction score
2,021
Points
128
Location
A few degrees south of freezing to death.
News says assailant was dressed in all tan but they show a picture of a man in dark pants, dark jacket, and light colored shirt. What other BS are they reporting in this story.
 
IMG_4826.jpeg
 
Some news agencies are speculating that he had a suppressor. LOL! Nope... that's just a sling.

1753756790936.png
 
"High powered automatic rifle" - media.

Gunman Shane Tamura used Palmetto State Armory AR-15 in massacre at Midtown skyscraper​


1753758170105.png
 
I think it speaks volumes of the NYC culture that this dude walked down the plaza in broad daylight carrying a rifle... all the way to the door and into the building. And NOBODY tried to take him down (tackle him from behind). Nobody yelled a warning. Just another day in NYC.
 
Once again the media is saying everyone wants to know the motive. Why did he do it? I don't give a fuck! He was evil. The end. I truly don't get this morbid obsession with the "motive."

20250728_233356.jpg


It serves no purpose! It's a waste of time and resources. The motive was evil. Next question.
 
Last edited:
Rumor is he had a beef with the NFL. They have offices in that building.

Every time a workplace incident happens my parter and I get calls. We have a strict policy about not working with celebrities or athletes. There are companies who specialize in this. No thanks.
 
Once again the media is saying everyone wants to know the motive. Why did he do it? I don't give a fuck! He was evil. The end. I truly don't get this morbid obsession with the "motive."

View attachment 33874

It serves no purpose! It's a waste of time and resources. The motive was evil. Next question.
I think it's just to have something to say to the cameras. Remember years ago, when they had little to go on early in an investigation and they used to say at the press conference..."At least we got the gun off the streets"... Like that was really going to make the crimes stats go down. It's Hamberger Helper for the Media.
 
I think it's just to have something to say to the cameras. Remember years ago, when they had little to go on early in an investigation and they used to say at the press conference..."At least we got the gun off the streets"... Like that was really going to make the crimes stats go down. It's Hamberger Helper for the Media.
People bring it up in conversation, too. It's not just the media. I find it super weird. As if finding some socially-rationalized motive offers some delusional "closure."
 
People bring it up in conversation, too. It's not just the media. I find it super weird. As if finding some socially-rationalized motive offers some delusional "closure."
It could have something to do with the fact most 'active shooter' events are perpetrated by a deranged late teen or 20-something white boy who came from liberal parents with money. Who knew today's liberalism fosters mental illness and violence in American youth?

On the other hand, the majority of fatalities caused by guns are related to urban gangs. Gang killings are played down by the liberal media because most of it happens in the cities where their Democrat friends are firmly in charge: 76% of the injured or killed are 17, 18, or 19 years old. 62% of injuries were the result of criminal assaults. The injuries are overwhelmingly concentrated in large, urban areas. Mostly in black communities.
 
It could have something to do with the fact most 'active shooter' events are perpetrated by a deranged late teen or 20-something white boy who came from liberal parents with money. Who knew today's liberalism fosters mental illness and violence in American youth?

On the other hand, the majority of fatalities caused by guns are related to urban gangs. Gang killings are played down by the liberal media because most of it happens in the cities where their Democrat friends are firmly in charge: 76% of the injured or killed are 17, 18, or 19 years old. 62% of injuries were the result of criminal assaults. The injuries are overwhelmingly concentrated in large, urban areas. Mostly in black communities.
Violent crime to gain leverage over a person or their belongings is one thing. The motive is clear there.

What I don't understand is the demand for a similar motive for EVIL acts. These mass murderers aren't robbing their victims. They're not raping them. They're not seeking to gain materially. It's just fucking evil for the sake of evil. They are killing just to kill. In other words... Evil. Period. The end.
 
Violent crime to gain leverage over a person or their belongings is one thing. The motive is clear there.

What I don't understand is the demand for a similar motive for EVIL acts. These mass murderers aren't robbing their victims. They're not raping them. They're not seeking to gain materially. It's just fucking evil for the sake of evil. They are killing just to kill. In other words... Evil. Period. The end.
I think their obsession with motive is to amp up their negative portrayal of groups they don't like (NRA, Christians, Republicans, Support of Israel, etc.) . It is possible that they want to be able to frame the shooter as a "victim" because of some experience(s) the shooter had as well, but given the amount of information MSM will omit I'd bet on the former.
 
Violent crime to gain leverage over a person or their belongings is one thing. The motive is clear there.

What I don't understand is the demand for a similar motive for EVIL acts. These mass murderers aren't robbing their victims. They're not raping them. They're not seeking to gain materially. It's just fucking evil for the sake of evil. They are killing just to kill. In other words... Evil. Period. The end.
Yep. The technical term for this is they are crazy. :)

Shrinks say one of every 25 people demonstrate sociopathic tendencies. Very few are violent. They are often successful. Control freaks, indifferent to others, very driven in terms of career or status. These arent necessarily all bad traits. Most CEOs and founders have many of these personality traits. Also politicians, leaders of various types.

A small percentage of them have anger or violent tendencies but a larger subset simply gain some kind of satisfaction from the suffering of others. Often being the source of it. The basic example is the bully. They enjoy hurting people in various ways because it's one of the few things that brings them joy.

Then there are the full on psychopaths who are compelled to kill and torture others for pleasure. They can't resist it. Many of them are serial killers.

I was required to spend time learning about profiling from profilers. Academics and even some FBI. This was so interesting to me I went beyond what I had to study on this subject. Took courses and attended seminars. It's fascinating and scary at the same time.

Most of the whack jobs who shoot up a workplace or school are sociopaths. They aren't 'born killers' suffering from psychopathy. They just have little or no empathy for other people. They also have anger issues. When something frustrates or pisses them off, they cant deal with it. So they fume and fester over a grievance or insult because it makes them feel like they have no control. So they act out. Compelled to get even and because they are sociopaths with no empathy, it doesnt register that they are going to murder people. They only care about settling a score. Because everything is always about them.

One of the key learnings in all of this for me was that psycho, violent religious fanatics (all of them) falsely pretend that what they do is righteous. Killing others in the name of religion. They are drawn to be jihadists or some other religious radical out of a tendency for violence. The truth is some kill infidels and cut off their heads because they like it. Not because it's Gods will.

Again, 1 out of 25 humans has some of sociopathic tendencies. Some call the most extreme of them evil. I call it mental illness. And unfortunately, the only cure for the worst of them is death. Like pedophiles. You cannot unfuck their brain. They will never change.
 
Last edited:
People bring it up in conversation, too. It's not just the media. I find it super weird. As if finding some socially-rationalized motive offers some delusional "closure."
They bring it up because they are parroting what they heard on TV. And they think it's important because the talking head mentioned it.

If all TV reporters where required to report only the facts that are known and proven, they would have much less to say to fill the time slot. I always shake my head when I hear them say, "What we know now". When in fact much of what follows that statement is speculation and inuendo.

Now back to Ryan in the studio where he interviews a libtard Psychiatrist, (who looks like Gene Shalet) who will explain what drives someone like this to do what he does. (When the shooters manifesto/suicide note is found, how often does it match what the head shrinker said?)
 
Back
Top