Video ICE self-defense shooting in Minneapolis (of course).

Now... how were these two dumbasses recruited, were they being paid or under the direction of an organized group vs. 'concerned citizens exercising their right to assembly and to protest'? I think we are going to find it was the former and tax dollars laundered thru an NGO are paying for and organizing these protesters. It's not just the usual boogeyman Soros. It's the radical faction of the DNC and many others.

Not to take the thread off the rails , but who is helping boost the protests in Iran? Three guesses and the first two dont count. Here's a tip: The first two letters are CI_ .

Having served on the periphery of that world, trust me that civil unrest no matter where it happens is organized and funded by whoever the opposition to those in power may be. It's orchestrated. People don't just rise up and assemble. That's a fairy tale.
 
Last edited:
Bongo Lewi said:
They couldn't preduct somebody getting shot but they are creating the environment for violence on purpose. This shooting was a bonus for the anarchists.
Click to expand...
They sure had all the signs printed, news stories written, outrage practiced, mostly peaceful protests planned etc. One of the podcasters showed the signs displayed with a timeline. It was within an hour or two that the pre printed signs showed up across the country. Same sign, same chants, same everything. I guess they have a mobile printing trucks ready to go across the country.

They didn't factor in that it was justifiable by law, ice covered roads, cold as shit that dampens enthusiasm.

It's almost like a scripted op is being run. It does conveniently take the fraud scandal out of the news.
 
1767967086510.png
 
The local PD and SP are lamenting that the FBI are not allowing them access to the crime scene/evidence/etc. :rolleyes: Fuck 'em I say! 🖕 Once all the info/videos/audio is gleaned from bodycams and dashcams and the FBI/DOJ/ICE has a chance to put together an ironclad presentation rebutting any claims of "murder", THEN they can release the scene/van/info. If local/state authorities want to create a "sanctuary" for criminals (an illegal invader IS a criminal), and do not want to cooperate with the Feds during their raids, then they can all go sit on a broomstick...

Balz threatening to call the Nat'l Guard on the Feds... :rolleyes: What an idiot! Trumpy could easily overstep that order and claim the NG for the Feds. ;) (I think)

I believe a clearer picture of the rear window stickers is warranted. THAT should explain motive/activities quite nicely, I think.

Speaking of rear windows, in one of the videos there is a white ICE 4dr pickup truck with a cap (topper) on the back with the rear window busted out. 😠 I wonder how that happened during such "peaceful" protesting? 🤔
 
Bongo Lewi said:
Olberman is lunatic fringe. I seriously think the dude has a mental illness issue. He wasnt always such a loose cannon.
Click to expand...
He should have just stuck to sports only. :rolleyes: Same with Stephen A although he's not quite as "loose" as Ovarymann...
 
It's funny how the general public (especially liberals) are prone to jumping to strongly-held conclusions based on assumptions and not waiting for the evidence to come out. And even when incontrovertible video evidence is before their own eyes, they'll DOUBLE DOWN on their delusional narrative.

Of course, just the laws of Physics would dictate that the officer had to be in front of the vehicle in order to shoot through the windshield AND strike the driver (reportedly in the head). At short distances, the flight of the bullet is a straight line.

And now a video from an angle that not only CLEARLY reveals his position in front of the vehicle, it shows that he got HIT fairly hard.


View: https://x.com/LangmanVince/status/2009626062884401525?s=20
 
Last edited:
Racer88 said:
Of course, just the laws of Physics would dictate that the officer had to be in front of the vehicle in order to shoot through the windshield AND strike the driver (reportedly in the head). At short distances, the flight of the bullet is a straight line.
Click to expand...
He DID shoot three times from what I could hear, a couple of those through an open window. I'm sure adrenaline shot at least one or two of those... Which one(s) was the kill shot? 🤔 There was definitely one head shot IMO, resulting in a bodily spasm (her foot WAS on the gas) and apparent involuntary ramming of the vehicles and telephone pole. :eek:
 
Racer88 said:
It's funny how the general public (especially liberals) are prone to jumping to strongly-held conclusions based on assumptions and not waiting for the evidence to come out. And even when incontrovertible video evidence is before their own eyes, they'll DOUBLE DOWN on their delusional narrative.

Of course, just the laws of Physics would dictate that the officer had to be in front of the vehicle in order to shoot through the windshield AND strike the driver (reportedly in the head). At short distances, the flight of the bullet is a straight line.

And now a video from an angle that not only CLEARLY reveals his position in front of the vehicle, it shows that he got HIT fairly hard.


View: https://x.com/LangmanVince/status/2009626062884401525?s=20
Click to expand...

That's so great.
The propaganda activists nationally broadcast media will keep that video on the down low.
 

Share this page

Back
Top