I'm not going to be going into a case or safe to retrieve a firearm to use in an "emergency".
My pirmary HD guns are in a quick-access safe next to the bed. They are all loaded / chambered. Always. If I need one (or more) in an emergency, they are ready to go. If they need to be loaded, they are NOT ready to go. Some of the guns in the bigger safe are loaded, too.
I keep loaded mags in many of the cases so it would be a matter of popping a mag in and racking the slide/bolt.
Personal preference. Nothing wrong with that. I simply don't want to have to take the TIME to do that in an emergency.
As an RSO, you should know that one should keep a gun unloaded until ready to use. A gun in a holster or stashed in a toolbox or desk (for example) would be considered "ready to use".
Exactly. And my guns ARE "ready to use." That is the WHOLE point.
Of course, in the context of an RSO, that rule applies to the RANGE. Guns at home are a different animal.
A cased gun or one in a safe is not "ready to use", IMO...
I don't keep guns in cases, generally. Cases are for transporting guns. And yes.... a gun in a safe can absolutely be "ready to use." I don't leave my guns out unsecured. Either they're on me, or in some kind of a safe. A safe can have quick-access features. One of mine does.
That being said, one of the primary rules for handling a firearm is TREAT EVERY GUN AS IF IT IS LOADED UNTIL YOU CONFIRM IT'S UNLOADED.
Yep. So they might as well be loaded, eh? Like I said... not ALL of my guns are loaded. But many of them are. But they are otherwise reasonably secured.
They can if they have an exposed hammer. Unusual and unlikely but it can happen. Depends on how old it is/design. Especially single action.
Semi-auto... I call bullshit on 'going off' . Unless the gun has been modified or it's a DIY and poorly assembled.
With the exception of OLD single-action revolvers (think Colt SAA), nearly all revolvers have a transfer bar or hammer block that prevents them from firing when dropped while cocked. It's been an industry standard for many decades.
The story didn't happen as reported. It simply didn't. No matter which kind of gun it was (which they didn't say, of course). He shot himself as a result of a negligent discharge. Why admit he was stupid and careless when there was nobody to witness it, AND the general public is GULLIBLE enough (and thinks that Hollywood gun lore is real) to believe the bullshit story.