Video Climate change is a money-grabbing hoax, and the Deputy Sec of Energy proves it.

I'm not the first to mix up ophthalmologist and optometrist and won't be the last. An ophthalmologist is an MD. The Navy has them and can deploy them if that's all that's available. Needs of the Navy thing.

The LSO's have accused pilots, on occasion, of needing to see an optometrist. It wouldn't hurt to have one on board. You would be shocked to learn the specialty of most Flight Surgeons. They rarely specialized in anything useful to crews. Thankfully, they get good training in flight related physiology.

That all said.... no optometrists on aircraft carriers. Also no pharmacist, no psychologist, podiatrist, or physical therapists.

Can the medical staff conduct basic eyesight testing? Yes. Just like in the civilian world. Do they have those allied health professionals at bigger shore-based commands? Yes.
 
What does any of this have to do with climate change hoaxes? Look, squirrel!!!

Anyway, the pool of doctors available to deploy must have been shallow in my time because we had some odd specialties for the ship's MD.
 
What does any of this have to do with climate change hoaxes? Look, squirrel!!!

Anyway, the pool of doctors available to deploy must have been shallow in my time because we had some odd specialties for the ship's MD.
We had 3 MDs.... the SMO (senior medical officer)... I'm not sure what his specialty was. Nice guy, but he was not well-regarded as a physician on the ship. If we needed to see the doctor, most of us (who knew) would try to schedule with the other doctor or the Physician Assistant.

We had a general surgeon. We had another general medical officer, too. (Probably internal medicine.)

After I got out of the Navy, I saw the SMO on the news. First doctor in the country that was arrested and sentenced for running a opioid mill that killed a dozen or so patients. Last I heard, several years ago, he was still in prison.

I just checked... He died five years ago.


 
Last edited:
The doctors in rural NC are a bunch of ass clowns. I make the drive to Raleigh or Greenville (UNC) for doc appts.

In Georgia, with one exception I couldn't find one that wasn't an arrogant Indian.

Best medical care of anyplace I've lived? Washington (state).
 
The doctors in rural NC are a bunch of ass clowns. I make the drive to Raleigh or Greenville (UNC) for doc appts.

In Georgia, with one exception I couldn't find one that wasn't an arrogant Indian.

Best medical care of anyplace I've lived? Washington (state).
I live in Greenville. Let me know the next time you're here. We can have lunch on me.
 
Last edited:
Someone needs to send Viner a pic of Florida...

1768852040603.png


1768852048705.png


1768852088493.png
 
Last edited:
View attachment 37773

It wasn't a prediction. It was a grift and a lie. And the gullible public fell for it... just like they always do.

"It's easier to fool people than it is to convince them they've been fooled." - Mark Twain
Everyone knows Al is full of shit at least since that article broke in 2007 about his electric bill. I don't know how any of these people have a shred of credibility with anyone. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
If melting ice caps will cause coastal flooding, then why does my Coke with ice not overflow by the end of the ball game?

I'm serious. Doesn't the mass of a body of water stay the same regardless of the state of matter it's in?

I think this is pragmatically proven by the falsified predictions as well.
 
If melting ice caps will cause coastal flooding, then why does my Coke with ice not overflow by the end of the ball game?

I'm serious. Doesn't the mass of a body of water stay the same regardless of the state of matter it's in?

I think this is pragmatically proven by the falsified predictions as well.
When I buy a Coke at a ball game I usually drink some. Anyway... frozen water takes up less space when it melts. Water expands when frozen but is less dense than liquid water. That's why it floats. The four states of matter are: solid, liquid, gas, and plasma.

Thanks for the science lesson. Can you tell me why a can of Coke ruptures when you freeze it?
 
Last edited:
frozen water takes up less space when it melts.

OK, then what is the issue with melting ice caps?

Thanks for the science lesson. Can you tell me why a can of Coke ruptures when you freeze it?

Probably a question of size as opposed to mass. Not to mention the CO2 and other ingredients are confounding factors.

But again pragmatically speaking all one has to do is point to the dozens of failed predictions to vitiate the fundamental premise of the Climatistas. Last I checked the Maldives is fine.
 
OK, then what is the issue with melting ice caps?



Probably a question of size as opposed to mass. Not to mention the CO2 and other ingredients are confounding factors.

But again pragmatically speaking all one has to do is point to the dozens of failed predictions to vitiate the fundamental premise of the Climatistas. Last I checked the Maldives is fine.
It's pretty simple.

When polar ice melts, the sea levels rise. It has been this way for time immortal. The water we have is all there is. No more is being made. When enough of it freezes, sea levels noticeably drop. In a long term thaw, sea levels rise. This is a normal cycle. I have no firm position on what causes it other than the sun does what it wants and the axis of the Earth occasionally shifts.

In a warming period, ocean temperatures also rise, so you have more storms and they tend to be more severe because warm water is like fuel to atmospheric events such as hurricanes. Warming water also causes changes to the marine ecosystem. Coral dies and there are species that can't adapt and die off. Also a normal cycle. Salinity can also change, which can also dramatically affect marine life.

Gore, Kerry, and idiots who worship them and their cause are very clever in speaking half truths. Weather and climate is constantly changing. It is true temperatures have been rising. It's true polar ice has been melting. Then some of the ice comes back. Then it goes away again. Stupid people look at short term intervals of a month or a year or even their lifetime - which is a nit when to come to shifts in climate. It can take thousands of years. Even millions. These trends are never linear.

Current events: There's a freak snow storm in Florida and morons are saying... Look! See? There's no warming! Debate them on their narrow and uninformed viewpoint and it's like talking to a retard.

In another warm time, the entire middle of North America was an inland sea. From today's gulf to British Columbia. Because it was warmer and there was less ice then. We weren't around, so what caused that? Is too much CO2 and burning fossil fuels causing the warming? Nobody, including climatologists with the training and education to understand why things happen really knows for sure.
 
Last edited:
Stupid people look at short term intervals of a month or a year or even their lifetime - which is a nit when to come to shifts in climate. It can take thousands of years. Even millions. These trends are never linear.

Similarly stupid (not to mention narcissistic in a broad sense) is the notion that any of those changes in climate are anthropogenic. It defies the laws of Physics, as well.

We didn't cause them. And there's NOTHING we can do to influence them.
 
Last edited:
Listening to some of these puds in Davos (ie: Goore) makes me wish I could just bitch-slap them and say "The climate is cyclical! You don't know what you are talking about! Shut The Fuck Up!" 😠

That said, it IS plausible the Industrial Revolution altered the climate a little. So did Krakatoa. :rolleyes: But looking at smog reduction in cities it IS true that man CAN affect the effect of pollution by policy change and sensible emission regulation. The problem with this is those that overreact and impose their green lunacy upon everyone else because they are in a position of power. 😠

PS: the only way to save the climate is if there is a mass extinction of humans... :D
 
Last edited:
This all began when somebody noticed that from the Industrial Revolution to current times coincided with a warming period. When we started burning oil and coal. Lots of it. Nobody is really sure if this is coincidence or humans did alter the balance of nature.

The latter is probaly a little bit true. Nothing humans do has no effect on the environment. Burning billions of tons of fossil fuels for the past 150 years can't possibly have no effect. But is CO2 from all that warming the planet? Uncertain. But let's not forget that a single volcano or massive forest fires can release more CO2 than the history of humankind ever has.

It's reasonable to presume that of the many models scientists who study these things have created, one of them is right. A long term warming trend, no matter what's causing it, will become a problem. One foot of sea level rise will inundate most coastal cities. It's not a question of if. It's a question of when. That said, it can be managed but the cost of the public works to do that will not be trivial. That's where the when comes in. Those projects can take years. In all fairnesss, those who insist we are fiddling while Rome burns may be right. If we are 50 years away from flooding risk, the planning needs to start now.

The cost of doing nothing is seldom zero. The government needs to decide how to manage the risk. That's hard for idiots to do.
 
Back
Top