Like it or not it is politicized and has been for a long time. Dismissing everything they say as wrong because of the source can have consequences.
I didn't say I was dismissing everything they say. But many in the general public will. I will say that I used to have confidence in such agencies, and now I have VERY LITTLE confidence in them. I won't entirely dismiss what they say in the future, but I will continue to do MY OWN research... Just like I did for covid, which is when I found out they were LYING. This was provably (easily) intentional lying.
It has basically been flipped upside down from what I learned as a kid. How do we know which version is true? Take it for the $.02 it is worth but we need to seek out news from a variety of sources in order to discern the truth the best we can as finite human beings. Information control is where the battle is, never have we had more at our thumbtips. What are we going to do with it all?
I'm a researcher by nature. And I have a background that allows me to read most literature and have SOME understanding of it.
The truth is that the ACTUAL scientific literature contradicted the public narrative from our government agencies. The crazy part is that when I dared to point it out to anyone, I was excoriated and in many cases excommunicated.
Here's the thing... to answer your question....
<<<Food for thought: if a known liar makes a true assertion, is that assertion true or false?>>>
Answer: It doesn't matter. They lied. They intentionally LIED. It doesn't matter what they say in the future. What is truly unreasonable is for you, them, or anyone else to EXPECT the public to forget about it or to forgive them for it. Even more unreasonable is to expect people to put ANY trust in what they say in the future. In this case, it wasn't a little lie. This lie had UNFATHOMABLE consequences... economic.... psychological... relationships.... ability to make a living.... ability to be Free.... etc. Not only are they unfathomable, they are permanent and impossible to rectify or recover.
It reminds me of the wife beater who swears he won't hit her again. Even if he's telling the truth... should he be trusted? Should she forgive him?
Take it for the $.02 it is worth but we need to seek out news from a variety of sources in order to discern the truth the best we can as finite human beings. Information control is where the battle is, never have we had more at our thumbtips. What are we going to do with it all?
It's also amusing that you suggested doing your own homework, so to speak.... Which I agree with! It's amusing because a certain side of the political spectrum MOCKED anyone for "doing their own research." Even I was mocked, and I'm actually qualified to read and understand the research (again... to a degree, depending on the subject).
I was mocked, excoriated, excommunicated, and socially rejected because I dared to do exactly what you rightly suggested. Ironically, I was mocked by NON-scientists who donned the mantle of
"trust the science" and using it as a cudgel, and my background (training / education) IS SCIENCE!
And that was EXACTLY the plan for the tyrants. Five years later, and not a single person who discarded me has come back to apologize or reconcile. NOT ONE FUCKING PERSON. (Yeah, I'm still pissed.)