- Joined
- Mar 2, 2022
- Messages
- 1,188
- Reaction score
- 1,879
- Points
- 128
You are welcome, of course! Mmmm, yeah. Experience I guess. Myself, I go by Glock engineering as a MINIMUM no-go gauge. Less support than they offer is no bueno. Removing sharp edges is actually helpful of course, because you remove the stress-riser from the equation, thus reducing the likelihood of case-rupture and subsequent kaboom. And it feeds better.So, how do you figure out how much is too much of a ramp. It would seem like you need decent experience on a lot of levels with a lot of different rounds and cartridge loads to make some assumptions about how much is too much. Getting the port work wrong on an engine just screws up the engine and not your face.️‍
Thx for drawing that up!
Glocks are so bad though, that I have yet to re-work a chamber transition or feed-ramp on an aftermarket barrel that didn't still leave more material encasing the bottom rear of the cartridge than a same-caliber Glock barrel has. So I figure I am within the safety threshold established by Glock. And, I don't reload. I figure once I start down that rabbit-hole, the next step will be owning my own mineral and metal mines, a chemical-plant and a cartridge-manufacturing facility -that just won't fit in my garage...