"Official" Thread The Political / Election Quotes, Video, and Meme Thread!

Looks like Sec'y Pete Hegseth has uncovered a few leakers.

The question is... who could have added that reporter to the Signal message thread. Maybe that's what this was all about. To try and smoke out who was not on board or undermining Hegseth.

Not an unusual tactic. Feed garbage to a suspect and observe where that information lands.
 
What the hell is going on with black folks?!



contrast.jpg




IMG_1319(1).JPG





IMG_1318(1).JPG
 
And it's astonishingly SAD that JOURNALISTS who are REPORTING on this have not done even a modicum of research. Furthermore, the "journalists" are SHAMELESS in the dereliction of their defining duties.
 
Bobster said:
There is a meme or gif out there showing various Dumpos in swoony poses with AI-generated MS-13ers. In THAT case, AI doesn't suck... :D
Click to expand...
Somewhere... I can't recall if it's at the state level or at a federal level... some representative is proposing a bill to make it illegal to post "AI" generated images or video.

Never mind that it would be a huge 1A infringement.
 
Bobster said:
I do NOT believe AI falls under 1A. Unless you think software code should have 1A protections... :unsure: :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Let me elaborate:
My welfare-recipient cousin has the time to be into all this AI BS. :rolleyes: He texts me images created by AI. Here are a couple examples...

skull.jpggayry.jpg

I was visiting him a few days ago and noticed an image of a gold and black skull on his computer screen (similar to above) and I commented on how it looked pretty cool. He starts describing how "he" took the info given and created it. The way cuz was talking, it sounded like an actual, living, human artist had created the image then I realized he was talking about gugel Jiminy. :rolleyes:

Getting to my point, where exactly does someone's image (or other) request from AI become a fabrication and no longer a human expression covered by 1A? :unsure: Just because someone says "draw me a skull with blood coming from its mouth" doesn't mean that is actually what they would have drawn if they had the skill.
 
Wow... even I don't know what to do with that. Holy shit.
 
Bobster said:
Just because someone says "draw me a skull with blood coming from its mouth" doesn't mean that is actually what they would have drawn if they had the skill.
Click to expand...
Another example: "create an argument for why artificial intelligence should be protected under the first amendment". I don't use AI (knowingly) so someone can copy/paste the statement in the quotes and see what kind of answer (affirmative) AI gives them... :rolleyes:
The term used for that might be "calling it in"... ;)
 
I am not a lawyer but I have stayed at a Holiday Inn Express. This seems to be more of an intellectual property issue vs. free speech. Copyright, patents, trademarks.
 

Share this page

Back
Top