That is the general consensus at Twitter/X.BINGO. I don't care about the $200.
That is the general consensus at Twitter/X.BINGO. I don't care about the $200.
Really more like:
I also have no affection for AR pistols.I fucking hate AR pistols. Loud as fuck on the range shooting line. HATE. THEM. I think they're stupid, too.
I also don't get "braces" other than as actual forearm braces as designed. As a shoulder stock, they absolutely suck. So, I don't get the attraction or utility.
Like them or not, I don't know anyone that Doesn't now own one or the other.I fucking hate AR pistols. Loud as fuck on the range shooting line. HATE. THEM. I think they're stupid, too.
I also don't get "braces" other than as actual forearm braces as designed. As a shoulder stock, they absolutely suck. So, I don't get the attraction or utility.
You should hear my .308 with a 10” barrel.Like them or not, I don't know anyone that Doesn't now own one or the other.
And I agree that a 7" AR is rather rude.
A AR pistol in 5.56 is obnoxious to those next to you without a can. Even with, it's still not hearing safe. However, A 22 LR is a blast. For CF, 300 BLK with subs and a can is more practical.Like them or not, I don't know anyone that Doesn't now own one or the other.
And I agree that a 7" AR is rather rude.
I own neither... and never will. I don't see the point of them from a practical perspective. I love guns. I have a variety of guns. I like unusual guns. But for me, braced AR pistols are just obnoxious and do not fill any niche or practical use. Perhaps they are "fun" for those who own them. And I'm definitely all about fun with guns. Many of my own serve that sole purpose. But I personally do not see the "fun" in AR pistols.Like them or not, I don't know anyone that Doesn't now own one or the other.
And I agree that a 7" AR is rather rude.
And THIS is why reduction of the "tax" to $0 is a Pyrrhic victory. For those who think a $0 tax on suppressors is a "win" or even a small step in the right direction... You are WRONG.
View: https://x.com/MAC_Arms/status/1939300399552266610
To me... this changes nothing. I still will not own an SBR or a suppressor... because I don't care about the $200 tax. I care about registration. And this post is correct... if we allow this "win," we will NEVER EVER see these items stricken off the NFA list. Never, folks. NEVER.
You're dreaming. Never. Going. To. Happen.Isn't the justification, by some, for the legality of NFA is that it is a tax? By removing the tax, I am wondering if it may open the door to a legal challenge to have these items removed from NFA as they'd no longer be taxed.
A .223/5.56 AR pistol in any pistol barrel length is a flamethrower. The powder is still burning five feet from the muzzle. A can is useless.A AR pistol in 5.56 is obnoxious to those next to you without a can. Even with, it's still not hearing safe. However, A 22 LR is a blast. For CF, 300 BLK with subs and a can is more practical.
Ummm.... who's gonna tell'im? LOLThe only thing registration does is prevent "ghost cans".
SBRs... I don't know why there is even such a thing. Firearm technology has evolved and this really is obsolete. A shockwave is basically a sawed off shotgun. But it isn't. Subguns, PCCs or Rifle caliber pistols are SBRs, But they aren't. It's a bunch of nonsense.
That's the scuttlebutt I'm reading.Isn't the justification, by some, for the legality of NFA is that it is a tax? By removing the tax, I am wondering if it may open the door to a legal challenge to have these items removed from NFA as they'd no longer be taxed.
Somebody who wants you to be arrested.who's gonna tell'im? LOL
The guy that murdered the United CEO used a "ghost" everything. Wait! You mean he paid no mind to the LAW?!??
Somebody who wants you to be arrested.
Ex wife, pissed off girlfriend, the Karen next door. I know a guy whose soon-to-be ex got his guns and gear confiscated. Court order. He eventually got them back.
Nothing is going to stop a criminal who could care less about the law. We have been over this. Those who use a makeshift unregistered can in the commission of a crime? They just add five more years to the sentence. Enjoy the extra time being beaten and sodomized. After the first ten years, maybe you start to enjoy it? I’d rather not find out. That’s just me. I’ll stick with buying mine legally.
Manufacturers have been investing in suppressors for a while now. Waiting for some easing of restrictions. Getting rid of the tax will probably cause a surge in sales. If registration or serial number were abolished? The next thing that happens is cheap Chinese knockoff silencer parts appear on eBay. People buy them instead of buying a manufactured suppressor. Every home made can is a lost sale. This is why suppressor makers want registration.
The other elephant in the room is… if you can’t legally buy a gun then why should you be able to legally buy a suppressor? For what purpose? In that case it is likely it would be used in a crime. Thus registration.
I don’t believe any sort of regulation or registration discourages a criminal. It does make prosecution and sentencing more severe. It also discourages non criminals who have a propensity for making poor decisions.
Nope, laws only work on the good guys. Doesn’t slow the bad guys one iota.Yeah.... it's certainly put a damper on Glock "switches." NOT. That comes with an automatic 10-year sentence. But the gang-bangers care not one whit.
Nope, laws only work on the good guys. Doesn’t slow the bad guys one iota.
Who cares about gang bangers. They mostly shoot other gang bangers.Yeah.... it's certainly put a damper on Glock "switches." NOT. That comes with an automatic 10-year sentence. But the gang-bangers care not one whit.